Food Products
Spam Canned Meat
Brand: Spam. Consider safer alternatives in Household Products category
Spam Canned Meat is currently classified as moderate concern in the NonToxic.com database, with a 72/100 comparative safety score. DEHP-equivalents measured at 3640 ng/serving. Compared only with verified Food Products records using the same analyte, unit, and laboratory method. This comparative score is not a clinical safety threshold. Panel of 18 plasticizers and bisphenols across 3 lab samples; 3 detected. DEHP-equivalents under 1% of the source-published EFSA adult tolerable daily intake (0.1%). This is a shopping comparison aid, not a medical or regulatory determination.
Product-specific laboratory record linked to the published PlasticList dataset. View source record
Evidence confidence
Confidence reflects whether source, year, and measured contamination fields are available.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Study source | PlasticList (plasticlist.org) |
| Year tested | 2024 |
| Contamination source | Unknown |
| Polymer types | Various |
| DEHP-equivalents (ng/serving) | 3640 |
| Microplastics signal | Not tested (dataset covers plasticizers and bisphenols) |
Full laboratory panel · PlasticList
3 samples analyzed, collected 2024-07-21 from Target, 1871 N Main St, Walnut Creek, CA 94596. Methods: QuEChERS, Phthalates and Substitutes; QuEChERS, Bisphenols. Values shown are the worst observed across samples. DEHP-equivalents: 3640 ng/serving. Share of EFSA tolerable daily intake — adult (70 kg): 0.1%, toddler (14 kg): 0.5%.
Laboratory sample details
- Serving size used by the source
- 56 g
- Recorded sample lot numbers
- F100 EST199P D05234 0515245 0938423
- Recorded sample expiration dates
- 2027-05-01
These describe the source's historical samples, not the package currently on sale.
| Analyte | Result |
|---|---|
| DEHP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DBP | 13 ng/g · 728 ng/serving |
| BBP | <LOQ (5 ng/g) |
| DINP | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DIDP | <LOQ (100 ng/g) |
| DEP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DMP | <LOQ (5 ng/g) |
| DIBP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DNHP | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DCHP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DNOP | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| BPA | 20 ng/g · 1120 ng/serving |
| BPS | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| BPF | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DEHT | 149 ng/g · 8344 ng/serving |
| DEHA | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DINCH | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DIDA | <LOQ (100 ng/g) |
Source: PlasticList record for this product (plasticlist.org, Light Labs, 2024). PlasticList describes these results as a snapshot suitable as a starting point for further work — not solid enough on their own to draw high-confidence conclusions. Our comparative score inherits that uncertainty.
Product details
Package and label information helps identify the product. It does not establish contamination levels.
| Brand | Spam |
|---|---|
| Barcode | Not verified |
| Pack size | Not verified |
| Packaging | Not verified |
| Label claims | Not verified |
Catalog source: Spam Canned Meat. Catalog checked: .
How to interpret this product record.
Use this record with its source, test date, measured substances and packaging context. A comparative score summarizes the available measurements within comparable records; it does not certify safety or predict an individual's health risk.
Compare results only when their units, methods and product uses are compatible. Missing testing stays unrated, and a current catalog check does not update an older laboratory result. Subscribe or request a retest when you need more recent evidence about Spam Canned Meat.
Product FAQ
Common questions about Spam Canned Meat.
Is Spam Canned Meat a lower-concern product?
NonToxic.com currently classifies Spam Canned Meat as moderate concern with a 72/100 score. DEHP-equivalents measured at 3640 ng/serving. Compared only with verified Food Products records using the same analyte, unit, and laboratory method. This comparative score is not a clinical safety threshold. Panel of 18 plasticizers and bisphenols across 3 lab samples; 3 detected. DEHP-equivalents under 1% of the source-published EFSA adult tolerable daily intake (0.1%).
What evidence is available for Spam Canned Meat?
Spam Canned Meat currently lists PlasticList (plasticlist.org) as the study source, 2024 as the test year, 3640 as the DEHP-equivalents (ng/serving), and Not tested (dataset covers plasticizers and bisphenols) as the microplastics signal. The evidence label is medium confidence.
What should I compare Spam Canned Meat against?
Start with products serving the same use as Spam Canned Meat. Check the exact variant, sample date, source and packaging. Compare numerical results only when the measured substance, units and laboratory methods agree; missing testing remains unrated.
Compare
Similar product records.
We have not identified another record with a matching product use. Browse the category to inspect the available evidence.
Source submission
Have a lab report, recall, or packaging update for Spam Canned Meat?
Share a product-specific source so we can review its identity, packaging and test results.
Submit product data