Household Products
Spam Canned Meat
Brand: Spam. Consider safer alternatives in Household Products category
Spam Canned Meat is currently classified as moderate concern in the NonToxic.com database, with a 72/100 comparative safety score. DEHP measured at 3640. Scored relative to other Household Products products in this database. Panel of 18 plasticizers and bisphenols across 3 lab samples; 3 detected. DEHP-equivalents under 1% of the EFSA adult tolerable daily intake (0.1%). This is a shopping comparison aid, not a medical or regulatory determination.
DEHP signal3640
MicroplasticsNot tested (dataset covers plasticizers and bisphenols)
Test year2024
Evidence confidence
Medium confidence
Confidence reflects whether source, year, and measured contamination fields are available.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Study source | PlasticList (plasticlist.org) |
| Year tested | 2024 |
| Contamination source | Unknown |
| Polymer types | Various |
| DEHP signal | 3640 |
| Microplastics signal | Not tested (dataset covers plasticizers and bisphenols) |
Full laboratory panel · PlasticList
3 samples analyzed, collected 2024-07-21 from Target, 1871 N Main St, Walnut Creek, CA 94596. Methods: QuEChERS, Phthalates and Substitutes; QuEChERS, Bisphenols. Values shown are the worst observed across samples. DEHP-equivalents: 3640 ng/serving. Share of EFSA tolerable daily intake — adult (70 kg): 0.1%, toddler (14 kg): 0.5%.
| Analyte | Result |
|---|---|
| DEHP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DBP | 13 ng/g · 728 ng/serving |
| BBP | <LOQ (5 ng/g) |
| DINP | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DIDP | <LOQ (100 ng/g) |
| DEP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DMP | <LOQ (5 ng/g) |
| DIBP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DNHP | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DCHP | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DNOP | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| BPA | 20 ng/g · 1120 ng/serving |
| BPS | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| BPF | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DEHT | 149 ng/g · 8344 ng/serving |
| DEHA | <LOQ (10 ng/g) |
| DINCH | <LOQ (1 ng/g) |
| DIDA | <LOQ (100 ng/g) |
Source: PlasticList record for this product (plasticlist.org, Light Labs, 2024). PlasticList describes these results as a snapshot suitable as a starting point for further work — not solid enough on their own to draw high-confidence conclusions. Our comparative score inherits that uncertainty.
How to interpret this product record.
This page is a comparison aid for household products, not a toxin-free certification. Use the score with the source, test year, contaminant fields, packaging context, and safer alternatives before making a purchase decision.
The most useful next step is to compare Spam Canned Meat against other household products records with stronger source confidence. A low score with clear source fields should be treated as a priority review signal, while a higher score with unknown source, year, or contaminant fields should still be checked before relying on it. Subscribe or request a retest when the record is important to a daily-use product, child-use product, or food-contact decision.
Product FAQ
Common questions about Spam Canned Meat.
Is Spam Canned Meat a lower-concern product?
NonToxic.com currently classifies Spam Canned Meat as moderate concern with a 72/100 score. DEHP measured at 3640. Scored relative to other Household Products products in this database. Panel of 18 plasticizers and bisphenols across 3 lab samples; 3 detected. DEHP-equivalents under 1% of the EFSA adult tolerable daily intake (0.1%).
What evidence is available for Spam Canned Meat?
Spam Canned Meat currently lists PlasticList (plasticlist.org) as the study source, 2024 as the test year, 3640 as the DEHP signal, and Not tested (dataset covers plasticizers and bisphenols) as the microplastics signal. The evidence label is medium confidence.
What should I compare Spam Canned Meat against?
Compare Spam Canned Meat with other Household Products products and prioritize items with stronger source quality, newer testing, lower contamination indicators, and higher safety scores.
Alternatives
Compare with stronger Household Products scores.
Source submission
Have a lab report, recall, or packaging update for Spam Canned Meat?
Submit product-specific evidence so this page, the sitemap, schema, and llms.txt can be regenerated from the same source of truth.
Submit product data