Deodorants
DrSquatch
Brand: DrSquatch. No contamination testing data is available for DrSquatch. This product is listed for completeness and is not rated.
DrSquatch is listed in the NonToxic.com database but is not rated. No contamination testing data is available for this product. A product without test data is not the same as a product that tested badly — we show it here so the gap in coverage is visible, and we do not assign it a safety score.
DEHP signalNot tested
MicroplasticsNot tested
Test yearNot specified
Evidence confidence
No test data
Confidence reflects whether source, year, and measured contamination fields are available.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Study source | Open Food Facts (label data) |
| Year tested | Not specified |
| Contamination source | Unknown |
| Polymer types | Not assessed |
| DEHP signal | Not tested |
| Microplastics signal | Not tested |
Label review · no contamination testing
This entry is an ingredient-label review, not a laboratory test. It is "Not rated" for contamination because nobody has published testing for it — absence of testing is not evidence either way.
| Screened class | Label match |
|---|---|
| Undisclosed fragrance (composition not itemized; DEP-class phthalates are common carriers) | Fragrancematched via ingredient text |
Ingredient list as published
Propylene Glycol, Water (Aqua), Sodium Stearate, Saccharomyces Ferment Filtrate, Glyceryl Laurate, Naturally Derived Fragrance, Lactobacillus Ferment, Polyglyceryl-4 Caprate, Polyglyceryl-6 Caprylate, Xylityl Sesquicaprylate, Hydrated Silica, Tocopherol.
Contains information from Open Beauty Facts (barcode 0810171576132), made available under the Open Database License (ODbL).
How to interpret this product record.
This page is a comparison aid for deodorants, not a toxin-free certification. Use the score with the source, test year, contaminant fields, packaging context, and safer alternatives before making a purchase decision.
The most useful next step is to compare DrSquatch against other deodorants records with stronger source confidence. A low score with clear source fields should be treated as a priority review signal, while a higher score with unknown source, year, or contaminant fields should still be checked before relying on it. Subscribe or request a retest when the record is important to a daily-use product, child-use product, or food-contact decision.
Product FAQ
Common questions about DrSquatch.
Is DrSquatch a lower-concern product?
NonToxic.com does not rate DrSquatch. No contamination testing data is available for this product.
What evidence is available for DrSquatch?
DrSquatch currently lists Open Food Facts (label data) as the study source, Not specified as the test year, Not tested as the DEHP signal, and Not tested as the microplastics signal. The evidence label is no test data.
What should I compare DrSquatch against?
Compare DrSquatch with other Deodorants products and prioritize items with stronger source quality, newer testing, lower contamination indicators, and higher safety scores.
Alternatives
Compare with stronger Deodorants scores.
Source submission
Have a lab report, recall, or packaging update for DrSquatch?
Submit product-specific evidence so this page, the sitemap, schema, and llms.txt can be regenerated from the same source of truth.
Submit product data