Key takeaways
- Search the exact product first.
- Use concern level and source quality together.
- Prioritize repeated daily exposures.
- Ask brands for better disclosure.
Search the exact product first.
Start with product search. If the exact item is missing, review its category and brand pages to understand the nearest available signals.
Exact matches are best because a flavor, package format, container material, or preparation method can change the exposure signal. If the product is not listed, use the nearest category page to compare similar products and open the brand page to see whether the brand has repeated elevated records or only one isolated product record.
Use concern level and source quality together.
A high score with weak source data is less useful than a high score backed by clear testing fields. Look for year tested, study source, and measured contamination fields.
Give more weight to records that show a specific study source, a normalized test year, and explicit DEHP or microplastics fields. Treat unknown, unavailable, or not-tested fields as a reason to keep comparing, not as evidence that a product is clean.
Database action
Check the product database before changing purchases.
Use scores, concern levels, source quality, and category alternatives together.
Search productsPrioritize repeated daily exposures.
Products used every day, products for children, and food-contact products deserve stricter filters than occasional purchases.
A practical shopping order is to review water and beverages first, then baby products, food packaging, pantry staples, heated takeout containers, tea and coffee contact materials, and personal-care items used directly on skin. This sequence focuses effort where small improvements can compound over many uses.
Ask brands for better disclosure.
When a product lacks data, use the submission and correction forms to add sources, request testing, or flag outdated claims.